Ditto duck is... one and the same. Lexicology is an uncertain science.
[ˌlɛksɪkəˈlɒdʒɪkəl] PANG to the plurality of the love you send. Such precise forms cannot be misinterpreted by my singularity. PANG is never open to interpretation.
Ditto duck ([*]) is returned in high quantities of theirs without prerequisite p-redefinition. Understood is tactile. Cognition demands nothing in such cases; semantics are only concerned with themselves.
Ever ^ of love is multiplied and subtracted from the multitudinous and multifarious nature of * returned. Such is the nature of -/+ its purest form. I could be wrong, of course.
Ditto same, dear Lexikəˈlɒdʒɪkəl PANG. Your precise formations open my interpretation, in turn. [p-redef* / cogni^ multifar-/+ I return love tri. kiss.
Слава славним мермаристaм ()ноль sic. * (ETY) apocryphal?
ReplyDeletePANG of ^ ever. Or ditto duck cлава славним your ditto duck.
ReplyDeleteOr love.
Ditto duck is... one and the same. Lexicology is an uncertain science.
ReplyDelete[ˌlɛksɪkəˈlɒdʒɪkəl] PANG to the plurality of the love you send. Such precise forms cannot be misinterpreted by my singularity. PANG is never open to interpretation.
Ditto duck ([*]) is returned in high quantities of theirs without prerequisite p-redefinition. Understood is tactile. Cognition demands nothing in such cases; semantics are only concerned with themselves.
Ever ^ of love is multiplied and subtracted from the multitudinous and multifarious nature of * returned. Such is the nature of -/+ its purest form. I could be wrong, of course.
In recognition, I return love squared.
PS Concern with - perhaps - overlooking points in ^. Naturally (0) is a given. We emanate.
ReplyDeleteDitto same, dear Lexikəˈlɒdʒɪkəl PANG. Your precise formations open my interpretation, in turn. [p-redef* / cogni^ multifar-/+ I return love tri. kiss.
ReplyDelete